Author Archives: Admin2

December 5, 2019

Auditor General releases the 2019 Annual Report http://www.auditor.on.ca/

Volume 1 Chapter 3 Section 3.09 Ontario Disability Support Program 

http://www.auditor.on.ca/en/content/annualreports/arreports/en19/2019AR_v1_en_web.pdf

 
Volume 3 Ministry of the Attorney General Court Operations Chapter 2
 
__________________________________________________________________

Judges and Ontario government ‘consistently hampered’ audit of justice system delays, auditor general says

“A main takeaway from the access-to-information issues we experienced was that Ontario’s court operations need to be more transparent and accountable to the taxpayers who fund it,” Lysyk wrote in her report. 
_______________________________________________________________

Nearly 70,000 patients injured in Ontario’s hospitals each year: Auditor

TORONTO — Nearly 70,000 patients are injured while receiving care in Ontario’s hospitals each year, the province’s auditor general said Wednesday, calling for immediate government action to help reduce that number. 
 
_______________________________________________________________

College of Physicians and Surgeons continuity of care policy puts patients at risk

The new policy raises disturbing questions about the autonomy of the College of Physicians and its ability to fulfil its public interest mandate. The CPSO should commission an external expert to determine if it compromised its mandate by permitting undue influence from the OMA. 
 
_______________________________________________________________

Ontario chiropractors governing body in feud with college for allowing chiropractors to make false medical claims

The College of Chiropractors of Ontario — which oversees the profession — is being accused by chiropractic educational experts of endangering the public by allowing some chiropractors to make claims about the treatment of cancer, mental illness, ADHD and autism. Members of the CCO’s own executive have offered such treatments or speak at conferences espousing them. 
 
_______________________________________________________________
 
Lambert v. Maracle, 2019 ONSC 7003 (CanLII), <http://canlii.ca/t/j3r32  

[2]                    There are three issues in this case:

a.      Whether the defendants, Michael Maracle, Jamie Walker, Ashley Kelsey, and Lianne Barbara Furlong, Vice President, Legal and Chief Litigation Counsel, from Aviva Insurance Company of Canada, should be compelled to attend for examinations for discovery on December 12, 2019, or such date as may be ordered by the court;

b.      Whether the appointment set for examinations for discovery of the plaintiffs on October 1, 2019 should be struck and whether the certificate of non-attendance of the plaintiffs on that date should be struck; and

c.      Whether Aviva should be compelled to produce an appropriate and further and better affidavit of documents, including detailed schedules, by a date to be ordered by the court. 

RESULT:

[3]                    The plaintiffs’ motion is granted.

[4]                    The affidavit of documents sworn by Aviva on July 27, 2017 and served by Aviva on June 17, 2019 was deficient and not in compliance with the Rules. As a result of Aviva failing to serve an appropriate affidavit of documents, Aviva has not preserved for itself priority in conducting examinations for discovery first. Service of an appropriate affidavit of documents is an absolute requirement in order to preserve priority in conducting examinations for discovery.

[5]                    An order shall issue that the defendants, Michael Maracle, Jamie Walker, Ashley Kelsey, and Lianne Barbara Furlong (from Aviva) shall be compelled to attend for examinations for discovery. As Aviva is not available on December 12, 2019, the examinations for discovery of all parties shall take place within the approximate four-month period between February 17, 2020 and June 19, 2020 on consecutive days. The plaintiffs shall examine the defendants first to be followed immediately thereafter by the examination of all the plaintiffs by the defendant Aviva.

[6]                    The examinations for discovery of all of the plaintiffs and all the defendants shall take place in Kingston on consecutive days within the specified time period, unless otherwise specifically and unequivocally agreed to in writing by counsel. Once the dates are determined, the plaintiffs and Aviva shall serve their appropriate notices of examinations in accordance with the above order of directions and dates selected. If counsel are unable to agree upon the dates for the examinations for discovery by December 31, 2019, I may be spoken to and I will set the dates for the examinations of discovery to proceed, upon being requested to do so by either counsel.

[7]                    The plaintiffs are entitled to conduct their examinations for discovery of all the defendants first, in the order to be determined by the plaintiffs, such examinations to be held before the defendant Aviva examines the plaintiffs. The examinations of the plaintiffs shall be conducted in the order to be determined by the defendants.

[8]                    The notice of examination of the plaintiffs returnable October 1, 2019 in Kingston is struck and is of no force and effect. The certificate of non-attendance of the plaintiffs for examinations for discovery obtained by Aviva for October 1, 2019 is struck and is of no force and effect.

[9]                    The defendant Aviva shall be compelled to serve an appropriate and further and better affidavit of documents, including detailed schedules on or before January 15, 2020 in accordance with the Rules.

[10]               Costs are reserved. If counsel are unable to agree on costs by December 31, 2019, counsel shall obtain a date for argument of the issue of costs before me from the Belleville trial coordinator between January 20, 2020 and February 14, 2020 to argue the issue of costs on the following terms:

(a)   Both counsel shall serve and file their costs outline and any materials to be relied upon no later than 5 days before the hearing date as set by the court.

(b)   The argument of the issue of costs shall be conducted by telephone conference held on the record.

(c)   If there is non-compliance by any party, the issue of costs will be determined based upon the material filed as at the date set for the hearing of the argument on costs.

___________________________________________________

Sarno v. Murphy, 2019 ONSC 7008 (CanLII), <http://canlii.ca/t/j3r3d  

[1]               This was a three-and-a-half-week trial where the plaintiff was awarded $36,000 in damages by the jury.  Given that this is less than the vanishing deductible amount, I dismissed the action after the verdict.  I entertained both written and oral costs submissions in this matter.  

[15]           Therefore, when I consider all the aforementioned factors and applicable caselaw, it occurs to me that the plaintiff would reasonably expect to pay $150,000 all inclusive at the end of trial.  Accordingly, I hereby order that amount in costs.

[16]           I note that the plaintiff is a woman of limited means and that her litigation insurance will only cover $93,000 of this award.  To suggest that the plaintiff can easily come up with this money ignores the obvious. Therefore, in the exercise of my discretion and given the principle of fairness, the plaintiff has 12 months to pay.  

December 3, 2019

Ontario Drivers Are Not Well Protected Financially in a Crash – Only 8% of people have purchased additional auto insurance coverage

We conducted out third Annual Survey on Ontario Auto Insurance this fall. It reveals that Ontario drivers are becoming slightly more aware of optional coverage, but they continue to be insufficiently protected particularly when it comes to medical benefits and income replacement benefits. 
 
___________________________________________________________________

Do Insurance Companies Ever Lose Money on Auto Insurance?

Just like any business, insurance companies would like to make as much money as possible, but the fact is that auto insurance in Ontario is heavily regulated by the government, and insurance companies are only allowed to make a certain level of profit. If they make too much, the government forces them to cut their rates. 
 
_______________________________________________________________

Understanding the Criteria for Admissibility of a Surveillance Operation as Evidence

Last October 3, the Court of Appeal of Québec issued an important decision in the CSSS Vallée-de-la-Gatineau Workers’ Union1 case, concerning the admissibility as evidence of a videotape obtained as part of a surveillance operation. In this case, the Court of Appeal nullified an arbitration award that had previously refused to admit into evidence a videotape showing an employee engaged in activities that were incompatible with her state of disability.  
 
________________________________________________________________
Early Thursday morning, a 77-year-old woman was run down while crossing Islington Avenue, in Toronto’s northwest, by a driver who didn’t stop to help her. According to police, neither did at least one subsequent motorist, who swerved around the fatally injured senior and kept going. 
 
_______________________________________________________________

Province failing most vulnerable after legal aid ‘gutted,’ lawyer says

An Ottawa defence lawyer says some the city’s most vulnerable people are feeling the effects of a court system that’s been “gutted” by a massive cut to Legal Aid Ontario’s [LAO] finances. 
 
_______________________________________________________________

Half of homeless people have experienced traumatic brain injury: study

Roughly half of people who are homeless or in unstable housing have experienced a traumatic brain injuryin their lifetime, a new study has found, with potentially severe consequences for their mental and physical health. 
 
______________________________________________________________

Insurance Brokers Negligence Cases in Ontario

Buying insurance is more complicated than buying a loaf of bread or a new pair of shoes. For starters, neither bread nor shoes are meant to last a lifetime, nor do they come with a fine print policy or instruction manual explaining what they’re all about. There’s no fine print when it comes to bread or shoes (other than perhaps the list of ingredients contained in the bread). 
 
______________________________________________________________

Plastic surgeon vows to fight potential class-action lawsuit alleging he filmed patients without consent

A Toronto plastic surgeon who could face a class-action lawsuit over allegations he breached the privacy rights of patients by recording them without their consent using surveillance cameras at his clinic said the suit is without merit and that he intends to vigorously defend himself against the allegations. 
 
_______________________________________________________________
Purdue Pharma is seeking an injunction to temporarily halt all litigation against the company in Canada, as it seeks to settle thousands of lawsuits in the United States over a deadly opioid epidemic. 
 
_______________________________________________________________

Patient complaints are up. Trust is down. What’s next?

John Jefferson isn’t the type of guy to back down from a challenge. So, when Jefferson’s care team told him they couldn’t save his foot after a motorcycle accident ripped out his talus, a major ankle bone, he refused to accept the possibility of amputation. Jefferson recalls telling his wife, “This is bullshit. There has to be a better way.” 
 

November 28, 2019

Resolving a problem with your lawyer or paralegal https://www.legalline.ca/legal-answers/resolving-a-problem-with-your-lawyer/

LSO Rules of Professional Conduct Chapter 3 Relationship to Clients https://lso.ca/about-lso/legislation-rules/rules-of-professional-conduct/chapter-3

When can my lawyer dump me as a client https://legalblogs.findlaw.ca/uncommon-law/when-can-my-lawyer-dump-me-as-a-client-510/

_______________________________________________________________

SABS Priority Disputes 101: Help!

It’s a Friday afternoon before a long weekend, of course, and you’ve just received a potential SABS priority dispute. A new Application for Accident Benefits arrives on your desk and the claimant alleges that she was in your insured’s vehicle at the time of the accident. Not surprisingly, you have no record of her under your insured’s policy. 
 
______________________________________________________________

SABS Priority Disputes 101: Reflection on Deflection

In our first article in the Priority Dispute Series, I provided an overview of Ontario’s accident benefit priority dispute scheme and the process necessary to pursue and dispute priority. 
 
_______________________________________________________________

LAT throws out claim after occupational therapist disparages the insurer

Ontario’s Licence Appeal Tribunal (LAT) has ruled in favour of The Co-operators after completely dismissing an occupational therapist’s report that disparaged the insurer and provided opinions outside the scope of medical practice. 
 
 
B.S. vs. The Co-operators General Insurance Company, 2019 CanLII 110078 (ON LAT), <http://canlii.ca/t/j3gn8
_______________________________________________________________

Aviva reveals shock statistics on car accidents in Canada

Aviva Canada’s new survey has revealed that half of Canadian drivers have no idea what to do immediately following an accident. 
 
_______________________________________________________________

Lack of Knowledge About Auto Insurance Continues to Hurt Ontario DriversA annual survey on Ontario Auto Insurance reveals that Ontario drivers are becoming slightly more aware of optional coverage, but drivers continue to be insufficiently protected particularly when it comes to medical benefits and income replacement benefits.

______________________________________________________________
Good-faith obligations survive bankruptcy of insured
The Ontario Superior Court of Justice recently confirmed in Re McEwen (2019 ONSC 5593) that an insurer’s duty of good faith is not extinguished on the bankruptcy of the insured. 
 
______________________________________________________________
Doctor facing criminal charges, professional discipline
An Ottawa doctor who specializes in pain treatment is scheduled to go to trial next year to face charges that include assault and uttering death threats, charges he denies. 
 
 

Ontario (College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario) v. Bélanger, 2018 ONCPSD 18 (CanLII), <http://canlii.ca/t/hrh6r

____________________________________________________________

Major shakeup in regulation of health professionals proposed in B.C. to improve patient safety

Patients in British Columbia could soon know about every single action taken by professional colleges in response to complaints about health-care workers, rather than just a select few. 
 

November 26, 2019

How does mediation work in personal injury cases?

Mediation is mandatory in any civil case commenced in Toronto, Ottawa or Windsor. There are mandatory mediation requirements under the Rules of Civil Procedure.
 
___________________________________________________________________

Ontario’s judicial integrity at risk with Doug Ford, Doug Downey scheme

Every politician dreams of leaving a lasting legacy. Ontario Attorney-General Ian Scott is one of the few to actually do so in an era where the role of the attorney general actually meant something more than being the premier’s lackey.
 
_______________________________________________________________

Ontario’s judicial appointments must maintain political independence, says former AG Bryant

“Judicial appointments are not supposed to be democratic. They’re supposed to be independent of the other branches of the state,” says Bryant, now executive director of the Canadian Civil Liberties Association. “The system is made up of more than just a political branch. The whole point of having a judiciary is to hold [the premier] in check in the event that he does something that is tyrannical or oppressive.” 
 
________________________________________________________________

Limitation Periods in LTD Cases: As Clear As Mud?

Earlier this year, the Divisional Court released its unanimous decision in Western Life Assurance Company v. Penttila, which determined that the limitation period in LTD cases does not start to run until the date upon which it is “legally appropriate to commence legal proceedings to seek payment of benefits that the insurer refused to pay”.
 
_______________________________________________________________

Fatal crashes will rise by 21 per cent if province proceeds with highway speed limit increase: experts

Fatal car crashes would likely rise by around 20 per cent on 400-series highways if the provincial government moved forward with its plan to raise speed limits from 100 kilometres per hour to 110 kilometres per hour.
 
_______________________________________________________________

Lorraine Explains: Flying wheels are negligence, not accidents

Will we ever get serious about the impact of vehicle owner negligence? A long weekend drive home from the cottage last May – a trip so many of us make, so many times – had tragic results for an Ontario man and his wife.

https://driving.ca/column/lorraine/lorraine-complains-we-need-to-taking-flying-wheels-more-seriously

_______________________________________________________________

Disabled man waits months for insurance company to replace scooter

It took six months, several calls and emails from a lawyer, and a CBC inquiry for an insurance company to finally respond to a claim from a disabled Nova Scotia man to replace his scooter, his only means of independence and transportation.
 
______________________________________________________________

B.C. Attorney General won’t appeal court’s ruling on expert cap in motor vehicle accident cases

The B.C. government will not appeal a decision by the province’s Supreme Court which struck down changes to the rules of court which placed a limit on adversarial, expert witnesses in motor vehicle accident cases.
 
________________________________________________________________

Windy, humid weather can make chronic pain feel worse, study finds

It may not just be in your head — chronic pain could feel worse on windy, humid days, research suggests.

Published in October, researchers at the University of Manchester in the U.K., along with funding from Versus Arthritis, found people with long-term health conditions were 20 per cent more likely to feel pain on humid and windy days.

________________________________________________________________

‘Now I have a lovely Scottish brogue’ — The science behind foreign accent syndrome

Sharon Campbell-Rayment had a fall from a horse that knocked her out cold. Her recovery from that injury was complete with one small exception. For the past decade, ever since her accident, she’s spoken with a Scottish accent.
 
 
 

November 21, 2019

How many of Ontario’s injured car crash survivors have to take their insurer to a tribunal hearing (LAT) to get access to recovery benefits? 

Lots. Too many. Which companies have more than their market share of claims in the LAT AABS system? All part of these Stats. The summary tells us that average # of days between application and decision has reached an epic 381 days – far more than promised with a new and streamlined hearings system! Note there are 2 pages – see the bottom of the excel sheet. How does your insurer stack up with cases at the LAT?

LAT AABS Applications (March 2019)

_____________________________________________________

Ontario government revamps simplified procedure to reduce delays for 2020

The Government of Ontario says it will double the monetary threshold in 2020 for civil claims that can use the simplified procedure process, one of several updates aimed at lowering legal costs and reducing delays.
 
_______________________________________________________________

Police chief proposes new Vision Zero enforcement team amid spike in collisions

Amid growing public pressure to crack down on dangerous drivers, Toronto police Chief Mark Saunders is pushing for the creation of a dedicated traffic enforcement team.
 
_______________________________________________________________

Surveillance and social media in personal injury cases

Although the Ontario Court of Appeal found that surveillance evidence excluded at a personal injury trial was not so significant as to make a difference as to damages, it was a “hollow verdict” for the defence in the case with some lessons about social media as evidence.
 
 
__________________________________________________________________

Self-regulation: the end of an era? Lawyer discipline and the role of law societies

Anne Rempel has not had a positive experience with self-regulation. She has made two complaints to a Canadian law society, but the process left her feeling the concerns were not entirely addressed by the “black box” system of lawyer discipline. 
 
_______________________________________________________________

Ontario Court of Appeal clarifies test under “anti-SLAPP” legislation

On August 30, 2018, the Court of Appeal for Ontario released its long-awaited decisions in a series of appeals[1] addressing the limits of the province’s “anti-SLAPP” legislation. This was the first appellate interpretation of s. 137.1 of the Courts of Justice Act (CJA), which provides a preliminary, pretrial procedure for a defendant to seek dismissal of a claim where the litigation arises out of a defendant’s expression on a matter of public interest.
 
________________________________________________________________

‘That’s a joke’: Ontario man reacts as driver faces $2,000 fine in near-fatal collision

Benjamin Schenk’s life was changed forever in May as he drove along Highway 400 south of Barrie.He and his wife Bella De Bartolo were on their way to a family cottage for the Victoria Day long weekend when a tire flew off a vehicle travelling in the opposite direction and crashed into their car.
_______________________________________________________________

Crash Not Accident: Better Road-Safety Reporting Could Save Lives, Show Researchers

Planes do not slam into the ground accidentally, they crash. However, such language is not always used for road smashes: they are often described as “accidents,” as though no one was at fault. Campaign groups have been lobbying for neutral road-incident vocabulary for many years—“crash, not accident” is a common mantra—and now new research has demonstrated that thanks to the leading language used in media reporting, blame for road smashes is often placed on victims.
 
_______________________________________________________________

Fact Sheet: Social Assistance Update

It has been almost a year since the Ontario government announced a number of proposed changes to our social assistance programs on Nov. 22, 2018. Many of these changes have been cancelled or postponed as a result of community resistance. This fact sheet explains where we are today.
 
_________________________________________________________________

Ontario Launches Free Routine Dental Care for Low-Income Seniors

TORONTO — As part of its comprehensive plan to end hallway health care, Ontario is investing in programs that keep seniors healthy in their communities longer.
 
_______________________________________________________________

BC attorney general considers legislation to protect ICBC profits from government

British Columbia attorney general David Eby is considering another plan to help keep the troubled Insurance Corporation of BC (ICBC) afloat – this time, with legislation that would keep the provincial government’s hands off the insurer.
 
______________________________________________________________

‘I thought it was BS’: Alberta drivers facing higher insurance costs

Some Alberta drivers are facing increases in car insurance premiums next year, following the provincial government’s decision to lift a five per cent cap on rates.
 

November 19, 2019

FAIR Submission to: Draft 2020-21 FSRA Priorities and Budget ID 2019-007

The message received by the public is that the FSRA is so fully stacked with insurers that there will be a singular message coming only from insurers and only in their interests to the Regulator. This does not ‘empower’ consumers who have effectively been silenced by an utter lack of inclusion.

 
_______________________________________________________________

Insurers’ medical examiner gets his day at Supreme Court of Canada

The Supreme Court of Canada is considering whether or not to send an insurance medical examiner’s libel case to trial, based on comments made by a personal injury lawyer about the examiner’s work in a closed forum that got leaked to the general public.
 
_______________________________________________________________

Class action proceeds against pain clinic

The Ontario Superior Court reaffirmed that infectious outbreaks are well suited to class actions, as well as the use of subclasses, when it approved a certification amendment and de-certification motion in a medical infectious outbreak case.
 
 
Background info at the bottom of this post: http://www.fairassociation.ca/2019/11/september-5-2019/
_______________________________________________________________

Self-regulation: the end of an era? Lawyer discipline and the role of law societies

Anne Rempel has not had a positive experience with self-regulation. She has made two complaints to a Canadian law society, but the process left her feeling the concerns were not entirely addressed by the “black box” system of lawyer discipline. 
 
________________________________________________________________

Rastin cautiously optimistic about simplified procedure changes

A series of amendments to Rule 76, which governs actions proceeding under the simplified procedure, will take effect Jan. 1, 2020, including the doubling of the monetary jurisdiction for simplified actions from $100,000 to $200,000, the imposition of a hard five-day cap on trial length, and the elimination of juries, he says.
 
________________________________________________________________

Distracted driving

First it was seat belts, then it was impaired driving, now, distracted driving. There are many forms of distracted driving that can arise in motor vehicle accident litigation. During the examination for discovery process there will be questions posed by lawyers on both sides about whose fault the accident was. Experienced trial lawyers, such as members of OTLA, have particular and special experience in determining this question known as ‘liability’.

________________________________________________________________

New Data on Disability in Canada, 2017

_______________________________________________________________

Ontario Government Changes To Disability Payments Should Be Reconsidered: Advocates

TORONTO — Advocates are calling on the Ontario government to reconsider its plan to narrow eligibility requirements for provincial disability payments and potentially cut hundreds of millions of dollars from the social services ministry in future years. 

________________________________________________________________

Welfare in Canada

Households that qualify for basic social assistance payments also qualify for other financial support
 
_______________________________________________________________

Online Concussion Support Group

The Online Concussion Support Group welcomes you to a safe place where you can share your frustrations and struggles and connect with others who have had similar experiences.

 
 

Assessor’s medical opinion evidence, libel, and public interest case

Webcast of the Supreme Court of Canada Hearing on 2019-11-12 38374 Maia Bent, et al. v. Howard Platnick, et al. https://www.scc-csc.ca/case-dossier/info/webcastview-webdiffusionvue-eng.aspx?cas=38374&id=2019/2019-11-12–38374-38376&date=2019-11-12

For portion to do withBent/Platnick scroll to 1:39:09

More detail re SCC leave to appeal: Maia Bent, et al. v. Howard Platnick, et al. (Ontario) (Civil) (By Leave) 38374

https://www.scc-csc.ca/case-dossier/info/dock-regi-eng.aspx?cas=38374

Factums: https://www.scc-csc.ca/case-dossier/info/af-ma-eng.aspx?cas=38374

Maia Bent, et al. v. Howard Platnick, et al., 2019 CanLII 35199 (SCC)

Platnick v. Bent, 2018 ONCA 851 (CanLII)

Platnick v. Bent, 2018 ONCA 687 (CanLII)

Platnick v Bent, 2017 ONSC 585 (CanLII)

Platnick v. Bent – Endorsement (1) ONSC 7340 20161201

Platnick v. Bent – Endorsement Re Preliminary Motion (2) ONSC 7474 20161201

Statement of Claim – FILED – 3334-15 – September 3

The original media story: http://www.insurancebusiness.ca/ca/news/auto/medical-files-routinely-altered-to-suit-insurers-claims-fair-186692.aspx?p=1

The latest stories in the media:

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/investigations/doctors-insurance-independent-medical-examinations/article37141790/

https://www.thestar.com/news/gta/2016/12/08/md-who-wrote-misleading-insurance-report-under-investigation.html

http://news.nationalpost.com/news/ontario-doctor-misrepresented-views-on-catastrophic-injuries-to-benefit-insurer-judge-rules

https://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2016/12/06/toronto-doctor-cant-sue-over-substantially-true-warning-he-altered-medical-reports-to-thwart-insurance-claims.html

Letter to MPPs regarding medical file manipulations Dec 23 2014

more info see: http://www.fairassociation.ca/the-independent-medical-examination-imeie/  and   http://www.fairassociation.ca/ime-providers-adverse-comments/

http://www.fairassociation.ca/muzzling-criticism/ 

Gluckstein Personal Injury Lawyers v. Verlaan-Cole, 2019 ONSC 6648 (CanLII)

Gluckstein Personal Injury Lawyers v. Verlaan-Cole, 2019 ONSC 6648 (CanLII), <http://canlii.ca/t/j3fdf 

[26]       Further, Rule 3.7-2 of the Rules of Professional Conduct states, “Subject to the rules about criminal proceedings and the direction of the tribunal, where there has been a serious loss of confidence between the lawyer and the client, the lawyer may withdraw.” Commentary [1] of Rule 3.7-2 states:

A lawyer may have a justifiable cause for withdrawal in circumstances indicating a loss of confidence, for example, if a lawyer is deceived by their client, the client refuses to accept and act upon the lawyer’s advice on a significant point, a client is persistently unreasonable or uncooperative in a material respect, there is a material breakdown in communications, or the lawyer is facing difficulty in obtaining adequate instructions from the client. However, the lawyer should not use the threat of withdrawal as a device to force a hasty decision by the client on a difficult question.

[27]       I have reviewed the record provided by both parties. There is ample evidence that the Client was critical of the Gluckstein firm and did not believe they were adequately representing her. It is clear that she had lost confidence in their ability to represent her to the standards that she demanded. She did not agree with their advice and would not accept the perceived deficiencies with her case. Accordingly, I find that Gluckstein had good cause to terminate the CFA.

[45]       The Client has not yet been awarded any damages or entered into a settlement agreement. Therefore, it is premature for Gluckstein to advance a claim for its fees, in violation of its own CFA and of s. 7 of the Contingency Fee AgreementsAccordingly, I find that Gluckstein is not entitled to seek its fees at the forthcoming assessment, as the issue is premature.

[46]       Given my reasons, the assessment may proceed with respect of the disbursements, but is premature with respect to the fees to be charged. At this juncture, there has been no determination of what damages the Client will receive. Once that is determined, then the assessment of fees can proceed on the understanding that s. 7 of the Contingency Fee Agreements must be adhered to.

LAT AABS stats – which insurers are using the hearings system the most?

How many of Ontario’s injured car crash survivors have to take their insurer to a tribunal hearing (LAT) to get access to recovery benefits? 

Lots. Too many. Which companies have more than their market share of claims in the LAT AABS system? All part of these Stats. The summary tells us that average # of days between application and decision has reached an epic 381 days – far more than promised with a new and streamlined hearings system! Note there are 2 pages – see the bottom of the excel sheet. How does your insurer stack up with cases at the LAT?

LAT AABS Applications (March 2019) 

IBC TOP 20 PRIVATE P&C INSURERS by direct written premiums, 2018 http://assets.ibc.ca/Documents/Facts%20Book/Facts_Book/2019/IBC-2019-Facts-Section-one.pdf

For more info on market share see:  https://www.fsco.gov.on.ca//en/search/pages/default.aspx?k=auto%20insurer%20market%20share%202018&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fsco.gov.on.ca%2Fen&ss=0

November 14, 2019

Webcast of the Supreme Court of Canada Hearing on 2019-11-12 38374 Maia Bent, et al. v. Howard Platnick, et al.

For portion to do with Bent/Platnick scroll to 1:39:09
FAIR is mentioned as an advocacy group in the closing comments at 3:47:06.
A long list of intervenors because it’s about more than quality of IMEs or medical report manipulations. When SCC decides on this Ontario anti-slapp case it will affect all Canadians and their ability to speak out Truth to Power in the public interest.
 
____________________________________________________

Reminder: Draft Priorities and Budget (see pages 17-25 on auto insurance) 

Comments due by November 18, 2019 
 
___________________________________________________________

The Rules, They Are A Changin…

January 1, 2020 will usher in a new era in Ontario litigation practice.   On October 23, 2019, the Ontario Government amended the Rules of Civil Procedure so that cases involving damages of $200,000 or less must be brought under Rule 76, which mandates and provides for a Simplified Procedure.  These changes will be effective January 1, 2020 
 
____________________________________________________________

Ontario Making It Easier, Faster for People to Resolve Claims

Ontario is making it easier for families, businesses and individuals to resolve their legal issues quickly and affordably by expanding access to the Simplified Procedure process in civil court. 
 
______________________________________________________________

Optional Accident Benefits Confirmation Form

This week a friend of mine emailed me this document. The document is titled “Optional Accident Benefits Confirmation Form”. It was sent to my friend by her insurance company. She told me that she did not understand half of what it meant. 
 
_______________________________________________________________

Two-year window to dispute auto claim denial not a ‘hard limitation,’ court rules

In Tomec v. Economical Mutual Insurance Company, released Nov. 8, the Court of Appeal for Ontario overturned a 2018 Divisional Court Ruling in favour of Economical, due in large part to a 2019 Supreme Court of Canada ruling over a price-fixing lawsuit. 
 
_______________________________________________________________

Auto insurance premiums going up in 2020 for many Alberta drivers

In a bulletin sent to brokers, and obtained by Global News, large home and auto insurer Aviva Canada said there would be across-the-board hikes of 15 per cent starting January 2020. It also confirmed to Global News that number could go up depending on driving and claims history. 
 
______________________________________________________________

BC lawyers push back against ‘plans’ for full no-fault auto insurance

Trial lawyers are concerned that British Columbia Attorney General David Eby could be working toward implementing complete no-fault auto insurance in the province – despite his comments suggesting otherwise. 
 
_______________________________________________________________

How Stress Can Shrink Your Brain and 6 Ways to Keep It from Happening

“Whatever doesn’t kill you makes you stronger,” goes the phrase. And somehow, we all actually believe it.

We humblebrag that we’re stressed about work, our families, our finances, and how hard and time-consuming it is to plow through everything on our vast and daily to-do lists.