• FAIR – supporting auto accident victims through advocacy and education
  • FAIR – supporting auto accident victims through advocacy and education
  • FAIR – supporting auto accident victims through advocacy and education

IME Providers Adverse Comments

‘FAIR – supporting auto accident victims through advocacy and education’

DUTY OF EXPERT 

Rules of Civil Procedure 4.1.01  (1)  It is the duty of every expert engaged by or on behalf of a party to provide evidence in relation to a proceeding under these rules,

(a) to provide opinion evidence that is fair, objective and non-partisan;

(b) to provide opinion evidence that is related only to matters that are within the expert’s area of expertise; and

(c) to provide such additional assistance as the court may reasonably require to determine a matter in issue.

Duty Prevails 

(2)  The duty in subrule (1) prevails over any obligation owed by the expert to the party by whom or on whose behalf he or she is engaged.

 *******************************************

Our Adverse comment page is not an exhaustive list or search of adverse comments. These are just examples of the comments of Judges and Arbitrators, the triers-of-fact, who decide the quality of the experts and their evidence. Surely we can trust in their words.

You can check out some of the insurer medical examiners by searching an assessors name on the Canadian Legal Information Institute (Canlii) website where court decisions are published at: http://www.canlii.org/en/index.html

You can go directly to LAT AABS cases on Canlii to find more information on IME/IE providers.

If you have a Superior Court or Licence Appeal Tribunal (LAT) Automobile Accident Benefits Service (AABS) decision that contains an adverse comment about one of Ontario’s IME providers you can send it to us for inclusion on our website at: fairautoinsurance@gmail.com

We highly recommend you access the legal decisions on Canlii and read the entire decision to understand the context of the adverse comments

A

Ameis, Arthur – Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

B

Bail, Monte – Psychiatrist

C

Cameron, Hugh Urquhart – Orthopedic Surgeon

Cashman, Frank Emil – Psychiatrist

Clark, Benjamin- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Conn Garson, Orthopaedic Surgeon

D

Debow, Stanley Lawrence, Psychiatrist

Dost, Rehan – Neurologist

E

F

Fielden Robert – Orthopedic Surgery

Ford, Michael – Orthopaedic Surgeon  addendum: Dr Ford re bias Ruling on Voir Dire 1700072138

G

Gnam William, Psychiatrist

Guerriero, Rocco – chiropractor

H

Hershberg, Richard Ian, Psychiatry

Hines, Robert Brian – Psychiatry

Hope, Christopher William, Neuropsychologist

I

Isles Katherine Occupational Medicine

J

Jovanovski, Diana, Psychologist

K

Kertesz Andrew, Neurologist

Kiraly, Leslie Tamas, Psychiatrist

L

Lacerte, Michael – Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Lawson, Kerry, Psychologist

Lipson, Frank – Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

M

Marton, Peter – Psychologist

Meikle, Ben Grant, Physiatrist

N

Notkin, Robert – psychiatry

O

Oshidari, Alborz – Physiatrist

P

Paitich, Cameron Bruce – Orthopedic Surgery

Platnick Howard A. – Family Physician

Q

R

Ramlochan, Emile – chiropractor

Reznek, Lawrence Raphael, Psychiatrist

Richman, Jack – Family Medicine

S

Darren Schmidt – Neuropsychology

Soric, Rajka – Physiatrist

T

Tucker, Joan M., Psychiatrist

U

Upton, Adrian Richard Mainwaring, Neurologist

V

Vitelli, Romeo – Psychologist

W

X

Y

Yufe, Robert S. – Neurologist

Z

ZABIELIAUSKAS, Raymond J-Physiatrist

Zielinsky, Nestor Ariel- Psychiatrist

Comments are closed.