• FAIR – supporting auto accident victims through advocacy and education
  • FAIR – supporting auto accident victims through advocacy and education
  • FAIR – supporting auto accident victims through advocacy and education

Latest News Articles

December 6, 2018

Proposed Court Reforms Benefit Rich Insurers at the Expense of Average Litigants in Ontario

In a perfect world, the Courtroom presents a level playing field. There are rules which are meant to be followed. There is a neutral unbiased judge who acts as trier of fact; decides right from wrong; just from unjust.

_______________________________________________________________

Insurer pushing for new auto fraud laws

A major insurer is calling for new laws prohibiting various forms of auto insurance fraud in Ontario.

________________________________________________________

Time to increase auto liability coverage: Lawyer

Ontario’s new government should require motorists to buy more liability coverage than is currently mandatory, a lawyer who represents claimants says.

 
______________________________________________________

The Surprising and Powerful Way Your Posture Affects Your Mood

Shoulders back. Head up. Look forward. These instructions, which I’m sure you heard more than once from some well-meaning adult when you were a kid, are wise for several reasons – which they probably didn’t even know at the time. As it turns out, paying attention to your posture can make a big difference in your mood.

 
https://www.thebestbrainpossible.com/posture-mood-brain-emotions/?utm_campaign=shareaholic&utm_medium=twitter&utm_source=socialnetwork
_____________________________________________________

Spinal Cord Injury and TBI recognized as global health priorities

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) and spinal cord injury (SCI) are increasingly recognised as global health priorities in view of the preventability of most injuries and the complex and expensive medical care they necessitate.https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laneur/article/PIIS1474-4422(18)30415-0/fulltext

____________________________________________________
 
Sokoloff v. Mahoney, 2018 ONSC 7223 (CanLII), <http://canlii.ca/t/hwf4f  
[1]                        Persons injured in Ontario motor vehicle accidents, who seek compensation for their injuries face a daunting challenge. They will need skilled legal counsel to properly advance their claims, while generally not having sufficient funds to pay their lawyer.
[2]                        We are fortunate that some counsel are willing to wait for their compensation until the case is resolved and moreover are willing to risk a lack of success at trial, by advising clients with phrases such as, “we don’t get paid until you get paid”.
[3]                        This is such a case, except the client got paid over one million dollars in early 2010 and their original counsel has yet to receive any payment for the plaintiff firm’s professional  services. I therefore turn to a partial history of this matter with a view to assessing how this case differs from “the peaceful and orderly resolution of disputes we strive to achieve.”
[77]                    I am not satisfied that the position of the Mahoney defendants will “appear” to be independently defended in their best interests, if their present counsel relationship continues.
[78]                    I am therefore directing that Falconeri Munro TucciLLP be removed as counsel for the defendants Wayde Mahoney, Kevin Mahoney and Carol Mahoney.
[79]                    This may present practical consequences, but inasmuch as they have received the lion’s share of the proceeds from the original negligence action, I am satisfied that they will be in a position to seek new independent counsel
[80]                    Clearly portions of the evidence put before me suggest that there is at least a possibility that one or more of the Mahoneys may be  in a position to seek indemnification, if that is seen to be appropriate. .  I anticipate that such new representation may well be able to negotiate a basis for their removal from this action.
[81]                    One of the difficulties to be faced in a case such as is that there is no specific applicable rule dealing with the filing obligations when counsel is removed over their objection.
[82]                    I am therefore suggesting, relying upon Rule1.04 (2) that the parties adapt Rule 15.03 and 15.04 (8) mutatis mutandis to advise the court and parties as matters of future representation are clarified.
[83]                    As to costs I have determined to award costs to the moving party for the entire motion including the presently determined element, as against the defendants on a partial indemnity basis. Given the proximity of the trial in this case I have determined to defer to the trial judge with respect to a quantum which may combined or set off against any future costs awards.

Comments are closed.