Having said that, in my opinion, there are many times in an investigation where an investigator already has jumped to conclusions and only views evidence, circumstantial or otherwise, through a pre-determined conclusion. In this case, I feel State Farm already had determined that they were dealing with a fraudulent claim, albeit 21 months after the accident and 19 months after the evidence (the 1999 Dodge Caravan) was scrapped. I believe, from that point moving forward, State Farm was looking at evidence to add to their fraud investigation instead of looking at evidence through an unfiltered lens.
-
FAIR – supporting auto accident victims through advocacy and education
-
FAIR – supporting auto accident victims through advocacy and education
-
FAIR – supporting auto accident victims through advocacy and education