• FAIR – supporting auto accident victims through advocacy and education
  • FAIR – supporting auto accident victims through advocacy and education
  • FAIR – supporting auto accident victims through advocacy and education

IME

Sharma v Stewart, 2017 ONSC 4333 (CanLII)

http://canlii.ca/t/h50xw

[31]               Second, there was the fact that Plaintiff’s counsel sought to cross-examine Dr. Rezneck on findings made about his reports in previous cases.  I ruled that cross-examining an expert about judicial findings in previous cases where that expert had testified was not within the scope of proper cross-examination.  The argument on this ruling, and the consideration of the cases that counsel for the Plaintiff filed consumed a couple of hours of court time.  Raising this issue unnecessarily lengthened the trial time, and it should also be considered in a minor way in assessing the costs.

To read more about this assessor see: http://www.fairassociation.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Reznek-Laurie-Psychiatrist.pdf

Comments are closed.